The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is this kind of effect so i think it's more complicated than has currently been measured easily but that doesn't mean we can't measure it if you say it look at let's just take the most extreme like let's say it's reducing transmission by two-thirds and it's clearly reducing severity of infection by at least 90 i mean i think that would be a fair assessment in some demographics probably more than that but it's a good log reduction in severity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.