The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but i think there's still like a little bit of that of like can you respond to this insult and still survive like it's it's much more like a of a you know we're sort of having a reverse population curve and like this conversation you got really crazy places right now but yeah i mean i i think there's a little like not necessarily like as big of the environment uh as it was before for sure like we've removed a lot of it but there's still some of
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.