The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the cost of being wrong if you don't go in to the ER you just stay where you are you don't go anywhere meaning wrong meaning you have a pulmonary embolism but you don't do anything about it that cost is infinitely greater though far less likely than the cost of you going into the ER not having a pulmonary embolism
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.