The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
influenza is also a single stranded rna virus segmented rna virus but measles is a single stranded rna virus too so is mumps and they have different genotypes meaning that there is drift as you say to cause there to be different strains but never has measles really changed its serotype so the vaccine that worked in 1963 still works today
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
then you have a virus like measles which is also a single strand RNA virus which also mutates but mutates in in such a confined way that the vaccines that you introduced or reintroduced in the early 1960s continue to work now you know 50 plus years later and though that virus has never mutated away from the vaccine even though it is also a single-strand RNA virus