We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
he said that hydroxychloroquine was shown to be active against the original stars but this is a bit misleading the original sars in vitro they used chloroquine and it inhibited the virus in vitro but there are millions of compounds that will do that it was never shown to be anything beyond that so that's a misleading statement
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.