The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what they found was that at the highest levels of meat intake but also with the highest levels of fruit and vegetable intake there was no difference in cancer incidence between the lowest level of fruit or of the lowest level of meat intake and even with the highest level of fruit and vegetable intake it's not an issue
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if the mtor story were true in terms of dietary protein we would have expected in that study to see a linear increase in cancer especially at each level of fruit and vegetable intake but we didn't