The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but essentially these people who had uh these Physicians these patients patients families who had all experienced this benefit and then people who were in the queue to get it done essentially you know with pitchforks in hand went to DC and said this is crazy like this thing has such a high cure rate how could you possibly take it away as an option for people and so they put their tail between their legs and revers it and let people you know you do them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.