The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so viruses are not they don't meet the criteria of of living things um they are uh essentially uh uh a strand of RNA or two strands of RNA or multiple strands of RNA or DNA uh that have been packaged usually with an envelope and with some decorated with some proteins on top but they themselves by themselves they can't reproduce they can't make copies of themselves which is one of the reasons that they're not considered living
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.