Paul Saladino· MD
I believe recapitulates our ancestral norm we probably were not in ketosis 100% of the time but I suspect it was 80 to 90 at low levels
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I believe recapitulates our ancestral norm we probably were not in ketosis 100% of the time but I suspect it was 80 to 90 at low levels
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
this is kind of the idea of a classic carnivore diet that it's totally reasonable and I believe consistent with normal human physiology and healthy and probably very beneficial long term to have some periods where you don't have carbohydrates in your diet
ketogenic human physiology as far as I can tell is probably the norm for humans rather than a carbohydrate based metabolism