The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you have a birads um four lesion you know the radiation excuse me the Radiology team is signaling that's a very suspicious that should have a high chance of being dcis or invasive breast cancer by Reds three it's probably I think I forget the exact number but I want to say like a less than 5% chance that that's a malignant lesion
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
by Reds 3 it's probably I I forget the exact number but I want to say like a less than 5% chance that that's a malignant lesion
if you have a birads um four lesion you know the radiation excuse me the Radiology team is signaling that's a very suspicious that should have a high chance of being dcis or invasive breast cancer