The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it can be it could be a physician or it can be a psychologist those are that's generally who does it so physician it would either be a a developmental behavioral pediatrician um or a psychiatrist that's most often occasionally it's a pediatric neurologist um or somebody else uh in um with some sort of similar background and training um but generally DBP or psychiatrist and then um and if it's not a physician then it's a psychologist that usually does the assessment
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so physician it would either be a a developmental behavioral pediatrician um or a psychiatrist that's most often occasionally it's a pediatric neurologist um or somebody else um with some sort of similar background in training um but generally DBP or psychiatrist and then um and if it's not a physician then it's a psychologist that usually does the assessment