Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
we don't know how long after you stop an ace inhibitor or an ARB your ace to receptors revert back to normal we don't know if there's a transient uptick in them before a downtick I mean there's so much unknown and we don't know if this matters that much maybe these levels of ACE to expression don't change that much and don't matter that much
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.