The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the background nutritional environment if it changed could make a big difference over a 10-year period And if you add to that incorporating a degree of physical activity as we all know this isn't about going from being you know sedentary to running marathons it's about being sedentary to some physical activity and it has a huge potential benefit on the types of health care costs that come from chronic illness
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And if you add to that incorporating a degree of physical activity as we all know this isn't about going from being you know sedentary to running marathons it's about being sedentary to some physical activity and it has a huge potential benefit on the types of health care costs that come from chronic illness and those two things together and addressing some of the US unique issues could bring could bring Healthcare expenditures in line with GDP growth pretty quickly but you have to have that goal over a 10-year period