The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and um you know a lot of these oxidation products can damage mitochondria, which have to be repaired, but they can also damage our DNA. Y and as people that have listened to this podcast before know, DNA damage can be a precursor to encogenic mutations that cause cancer, particularly if they're double stranded breaks, particularly if the double stranded breaks occur in parts of the genome that allow for an encogenic mutation to occur.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.