The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we've seen humans living in the wild and this is the way it looks it's the way they live this is what they prioritize and this is how they are and pretty sure we can recreate that in our own lives
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in fact we want to do the opposite because we see them as a window to the past and this whole podcast has been about how we get back to living more like our ancestors have in the past and back to the sort of fundamental default mode happiness health etc