The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we did an experiment where we took attenuated virus infected monkeys and then we challenged them with a different virus and we got some level of protection but what we saw was a few animals that had very very high virus though - were not protected at all the incoming virus had recombined with a vaccine virus to form an entirely new virus that was highly pathogenic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.