Peter Attia· MD
I think the Hallmarks as a list a kind of arbitrary list not completely arbitrary because they had some reasons for being there and I don't think any of us would say that those 12 things are not involved in aging
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think the Hallmarks as a list a kind of arbitrary list not completely arbitrary because they had some reasons for being there and I don't think any of us would say that those 12 things are not involved in aging
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but it also is misleading because I think the idea that aging is 12 different things and you just need to fix all 12 of them is is completely wrong.