The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when we're burning fat we want to conserve energy conserve fuel we want to turn our metabolic rate down we aren't going to be favoring reproduction we aren't going to be favoring a high metabolic State we're aren't going to be favoring strong cognitive function a good immune system we're going to be trying to survive because this is what is mimicking the starvation state
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.