The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
on the one hand improved technology enables us to collect much more data on patients than ever before and patients themselves are better able to monitor their own biomarkers this is good even better artificial intelligence and machine learning are being harnessed to try to digest this massive perfusion of data and come up with more definitive assessments of our risk of say heart disease then the rather simple risk factor-based calculators we have now
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.