The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but it could also be that they feel like their whole head of hair is not as thick as it was and that would be a volume issue so that could be the sheer numbers of hairs that are growing at any given time giving you let's just call it the pony tail volume
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but all of a sudden if you do something to switch that those percentages then you're gonna get a thinner head of hair meaning that there's less trees in the forest perhaps