The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
death from any cause and change in cholesterol in the cohorts receiving the diets for one year or more. A and what do you see? Like there's actually a pretty clear dose response from cholesterol lowering and probability of death. That's what it's saying. The more right to you go, the lower the cholesterol drops as a result of the intervention. And the higher the probability of death.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Um in the Minnesota coronary experiment, the people that had the highest degree of cholesterol lowering had the highest increased rate of death, right?