The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we have a system in this country called influenza like illness surveillance or syndromic surveillance we have set up in a whole series of randomly chosen physicians offices around the country and we survey it every week to every several times a week during the flu season to give us an idea of you know if you have this constellation the signs and symptoms is probably highly suggestive of flu and this is what's going on
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.