The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are two last topics I want to get to one being how we would study the durability of immune response which is effectively the most jugular question out there today I mean if we're gonna think about this through the lens of vaccination and we're gonna think about this through the lens of herd immunity natural or otherwise we better figure out exactly what's gonna happen to these people who get infected and what superpowers they do or don't have in the future
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
regardless the durability of their immune response has to be one of the most important questions we understand