The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
rather than trying to diddle the genes if you're at the stage of an embryo with inv vitro fertilization you can simply do selection of an embryo that doesn't have that genetic risk and therefore you're not increasing the risk of something off Target and you're still accomplishing what it is that you were set out to achieve
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.