The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we know about current hunter-gatherer tribes is that they are shorter than their previous generations and that there are political norms now that prevent them from hunting big animals
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you look at indigenous people they are actually smaller than their relatives over a number of generations and this is probably because they are limited in their scope they're limited in their hunting lands they're limited in what they can hunt indigenous people are unfortunately limited whether it's the hadza the kang the sun whoever they're limited by the countries they live in