The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
let's say you're you have a frozen shoulder on this side it was going to look completely normal to look at you have pain you have stiffness you can't do all the things you want to do and I look here and I see that this one's 70 and I look here and it goes only goes to 30 and it starts to hurt when I do that that's that adhesive capsulitis in there that's blocking motion
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
that's that adhesive capsulitis in there that's blocking motion abduction which is this movement here