The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
every every biochemical textbook says we only get two percent oxygen coming out of the mitochondria through a substrate level phosphorylation just like we get from the cytoplasm but for cancer cells people say oh you can get a lot more ATP from the cytoplasm but not thinking you can up regulate the same phenomenon inside the mitochondria
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's an undercurrent here to what we're talking about which is the view that you hold is the minority view today
yeah well Warburg did that but he was looking he didn't know about SLP right he well lactic acid production the production of ATP the pyruvate kinase is substrate level phosphorylation but it's cytoplasmic yes yes it's not monitor sorry oh he did not know he couldn't have known because the very systems that were the they didn't come out until the fifties sixties that we knew that there was another form of ATP production inside the mitochondria