The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at the history of kidney transplantation through the 1950s and into the 1960s most of the kidney transplants performed were between twins which you know there's a limited supply of available organs there so you could see right there that that was going to be a capacity problem
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the first kidney transplant as you know performed in 1954 at brigham and women's hospital by joseph murray who eventually won the nobel prize was in identical twins