Peter Attia· MD
in my view I I've said this before I think this is one of the most important studies in the field in the past 20 years maybe 50 years for that reason
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in my view I I've said this before I think this is one of the most important studies in the field in the past 20 years maybe 50 years for that reason
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think the other maybe more important part of that study that often doesn't get always talked about is that this was the first time that any intervention You could argue a little bit about caloric restriction that's a that's kind of a tangent but I would say it's the first time that any intervention was convincingly shown to extend lifespan when treatment was started in middle age so about the mouse equivalent of a 60 65y old person biologically