Rhonda Patrick· PhD
Well, you can have a biogenerator which, essentially, is just a tube with cells in it, okay? And you let them talk to damaged tissue, which are the signals that come out.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Well, you can have a biogenerator which, essentially, is just a tube with cells in it, okay? And you let them talk to damaged tissue, which are the signals that come out.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And let them talk to damaged tissue, which are the signals that come out. Those signals now come to those stem cells, say, "We need to do something." And they start to make growth factors and they're gonna start to make order, and that comes out on the other end.