The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Well, I mean, you know that if you take a bunch of cells, identical cells, genetically identical cells and you apply some toxin and then you look at damage, you get a Gaussian curve, meaning there are some cells that don't respond very well. Most of the cells respond a certain way and then some cells that are super responders.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.