The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and I also think it kind of makes sense that if you have an immune system that's functioning the way it's supposed to you can actually deal with the mutation accumulation because your immune is going to clear those mm-hmm before they become yeah problems
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you have an immune system that's functioning the way it's supposed to you can actually deal with the mutation accumulation because your immune system is going to clear those