Paul Saladino· MD
and this to me is just um I I respectfully disagree with him I think it's an interesting idea uh it's a hypothesis and I think it's really wrong
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
and this to me is just um I I respectfully disagree with him I think it's an interesting idea uh it's a hypothesis and I think it's really wrong
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the idea that it's vestigal I think is like you would have a really hard time making argument for that so you can say whatever you want you can say it's vestigal but I would really like to see all the lines of reasoning basically discounting all these different components showing that it's actually just sigil because there's so many functions of LDL and cholesterol in general that to just say like oh yeah it's vidals you know that's a that's a you need to have a big burden of proof for that