The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
use this immunotherapy concept much more broadly in cancer is going to require us to develop the understanding of okay well which tricks are being pulled and how to be able to you know really Target those very specifically we can't disable people's immune systems like that's not okay
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in terms of you know trying to close the gap then and use this immunotherapy concept much more broadly in cancer is going to require us to develop the understanding of okay well which tricks are being pulled and how to be able to you know really Target those very specifically