The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
When they tested everyone on the ship right like 20 percent were positive for coronavirus with rt-pcr which is the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction looking for RNA in the posterior pharynx and we have to have conversations about the sensitivity and specificity of that test but those aside for now the majority people didn't actually show up positive for coronavirus on the ship well that's interesting and then of the people who were positive 60% were asymptomatic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.