The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
maybe late 90s early 2000s pablo started to apply those teachings to that athletic population and um there's meaning to an uninjured athletic population or to an injured athletic population probably at that time more of an injured population
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
pavel professor colas just to go in a little bit of his background you know again he he's the head of prague school of rehabilitation he's also head clinician for the czech olympic teams and czech national sports teams hockey soccer men's and women's tennis he himself was a high level olympic level gymnasts