The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when incubation periods are short you're the best you can hope for is to modify disease associated with infection so that's true of flu it's true of respiratory and Central virus is true of rotavirus
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the longer incubation period diseases are better in the sense that you really can induce sterilizing immunity and therefore you really can't eliminate those viruses we eliminated measles from this country by the year 2000 we eliminated rubella from this country by the year 2005.
the longer incubation period diseases are better in the sense that you really can induce sterilizing immunity and therefore you really can't eliminate those viruses we eliminated measles from this country by the year 2000 we eliminated rubella from this country by the year 2005.