Peter Attia· MD
when you're recording directly on the surface, you're basically at the source itself.
Verbal pushback — no audited source on record.
90
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you're recording directly on the surface, you're basically at the source itself.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So one of the reasons for that is the skull and the scalp uh are a major loss of signal. Yeah. um the signals are small to begin with. So once you're trying to interpret them through the scholar scalp, they're basically gone and very diffuse too. So trying to understand like where they came from in any precise way is almost impossible.
And so, um, one of the reasons for that is the skull and the scalp, uh, are a major loss of signal. Yeah. Um, the signals are small to begin with, so once you're trying to interpret them through the scholar scalp, they're basically gone and very diffuse, too. So trying to understand like where they came from in any precise way is almost impossible. Um when you're recording directly on the surface you're basically at the source itself.