The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so are we to take away from this that if you go into CVS Walgreens pick your favorite pharmacy you buy your drug and assuming you can even figure out what company sold it which turns out not to be easy we're gonna talk about that if it comes from a company that is Indian or Chinese you wouldn't be overly paranoid to assume there's an 80% chance that there's some misinformation in what you're taking
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.