The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so you look at the neck very thin uh uh small diameter vertebra it's made for bending and Mobility fabulous but as you move down the spine and get to the bottom two where the thickest is they do not tolerate bending near as much as they tolerate compression so there's the first um uh anatomic feature that describes why the bending stresses are greatest at the thicker Two Joints which are uh at the bottom
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what is it about the way we interact with the world and the curvature of our spine that tends to produce the majority of injuries at either the interface between L4 and L5 or the interface between L5 and S1
so there's the first um uh anatomic feature that describes why the bending stresses are greatest at the thicker Two Joints which are uh at the bottom