The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if we look at that meat line which is going up very slightly the slope of this line is pretty low what if we break that down into types of meat it's mostly poultry and no one would suggest that poultry is a bad thing because poultry is supposed to be good for us right you guys know this is kind of tongue-in-cheek in my mind because I wrote all about how red meat ruminants are fantastic poultry is great for humans too but I think red meat is some of the best meat we can eat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.