The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you know i've spoken with virologists who have said look to try to take a virus from 96.2 percent to a hundred percent um i mean would take forever i mean that would be a very long period of genetic manipulation so um the point being it seems unlikely at least if if that's true that that virus ultimately became sars cov2
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.