The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I mean it could be that if you've had a massive injury let's say you just had a stroke or a trauma of some sort it's as long as you can keep your mitochondrial nad high you should be able to keep all your cells alive rather than dying
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we found that mitochondrial nad levels are really really important and we could boost them up by over expressing turning on one of these nem nem PT genes that makes nad and makes it in in the mitochondria what was exciting about the discovery was that as long as we kept the mitochondrial nad levels high even though the cell was really damaged we could hit it with DNA damage pretty hard it didn't die and we couldn't even detect the ATP which is the energy required for life