The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But if that were true then wouldn't it must be more complicated or else you wouldn't have Turner syndrome. >> It is so yes. So what happens is and that's right and we can talk about Turner syndrome but uh something like 20% and here someone might correct me but I think around 20% of the genes on the silenced X escape inactivation and that turns out to be important that there are some genes in females that need where where the female needs the double
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.