The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are salads there are you know compounds that are used to create you know waterproof textiles and flame retardants and our furniture and things like that and I think for a long time people expected these compounds to be inert to stay put basically in our bottles but we now know or on our furniture or in our carpets but we now know that that these compounds are able to enter the environment and as a result they are found in 99 percent of human beings
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.