The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that is really the benefit of having what i call a surrogate marker you know something like grim age is arguably much closer to the mechanisms it's perhaps less um susceptible to confounding factors you know and so maybe that's why these surrogate markers pick it up
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i mean obviously the the methylation patterns these are molecular changes that happen before someone has a heart attack before someone has high blood pressure and these are accumulated you know changes in at the molecular level that are occurring