The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but the crazy thing is we're pretty much more or less doing that now you know so some of the fluid solutions and some of the you know minor details of what additives are in the fluid has changed but that's essentially the way we've been preserving organs since the 1960s 70s you know which is pretty remarkable that that was that was one as you said one of the early barriers figured out in the field
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.