Peter Attia· MD
And chronic elevation of cortisol in the body is actually anabolic to fat, right? You accumulate fat. It's catabolic to muscle. Muscle decays, uh, fat accumulates.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And chronic elevation of cortisol in the body is actually anabolic to fat, right? You accumulate fat. It's catabolic to muscle. Muscle decays, uh, fat accumulates.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
above the neck, chronic elevation of cortisol might have the opposite effect. It might actually be catabolic to fat and therefore it accentuates the fat loss.