Peter Attia· MD
in other words is this number predictive of future years of life because right now we have this thing called Chron ologic age that is the single best predictor of future years of life
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in other words is this number predictive of future years of life because right now we have this thing called Chron ologic age that is the single best predictor of future years of life
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So intrinsically if it works it's going to do better than the than chronologic age for the second generation clocks.