The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Um, it, you know, takes 10 minutes. You lay on a table, a little scanner moves over your body, and it's using two very lowd dose X-rays that are absorbed differentially by bones and soft tissues. And so it's able to differentiate between atapost tissue, bone, and lean tissue or nonatapost tissue.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.